promt.

There is also the difference of scientific data and the interpretation and
presentation of data. There’s an article that explores that topic here:
"Misleading Statistics Examples - Discover The Potential For Misuse of
Statistics & Data In The Digital Age" By Mona Lebied 
https://www.datapine.com/blog/misleading-statistics-and-data/

In another article that I found the author begins the section on the
disadvantages of breed-specific legislation by immediately going into
people’s U.S. Constitution 14th Amendment Rights which is side-
stepping the issue of whether or not the dogs are too dangerous to be
kept in city limits in light of public safety. "Attacking the Dog-Bite
Epidemic: Why Breed-Specific Legislation Won't Solve the Dangerous-
Dog Dilemma" https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4168&context=flr

The other thing I have noticed is that opponents of breed-specific
legislation continue to use the word "bite" in articles on the subject but
there is a big difference between a dog biting someone and one
mauling someone. I think we should err on the side of caution and be
respectful of the work done by the city councilwomen as well as be
considerate of the innocent people injured and killed and their loved
ones.
4daysago  Like Reply


Davyd S- * Skyland                                                         
Yes. PETA hates homeless pets. They have one shelter and kill
90% of the pets that enter for the past decade. They are disliked
by the majority of homeless pet advocates. Newkirk is a
crackpot, PETA is a cult.